The Program

|
This summer
(2008), three sets of science teachers, while pursuing hands-on
internships, encountered technical writing on their way to other
adventures. That's not what most of them planned, but almost always
they found this surprise encounter interesting, revealing, and useful.
Best of all, what they learned about technical writing returned
with them to their classrooms in the fall.
|
ETEC Level 3
|
The Edward Teller Education Center (ETEC,
etec.ucdavis.edu), under the leadership of Carey Kopay, offers California
public school teachers four levels of science-oriented professional
development. ETEC packages this service as topical academies, which
begin with two-day workshops and grow in length and depth into summer-long
internships with working scientists. ETEC's Level 3 workshop, which
occurs in mid-July each year, brings interested science teachers
(19 in 2008, most from central California high schools) together
for a week at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Besides
tips from master teachers, tours, and job scheduling, which the
teachers expect, they also get two 90-minute sessions on technical
writing, which most do not expect.
Their first session focuses pedagogically, on technical writing
in the science class. After a quick review of text usability principles,
I share the technical literacy project's classroom-tested strategies,
guidelines, and exercises for building the student skills needed
to create effective instructions and descriptions. Pointing out
the empirical evidence for these usability techniques as well as
the engineering character of good text design helps these teachers
integrate nonfiction-writing activities into their science (not
language arts) classes.
The second ETEC Level-3 technical writing session applies the same
principles to each teacher's more personal publishing goals: writing
science articles, drafting white papers, and planning grant proposals.
On their post-workshop evaluation forms, the level-3 teacher-interns
often commented on the helpfulness of these technical writing sessions,
rating them 4.5 (out of 5) for "effectiveness."
|
ETEC Level 4
|
Teachers who
have worked their way through the first three levels of ETEC academies,
usually over several years, can be eligible for a paid 6-week internship
with an LLNL mentor who does research in the area (for example,
biology or physics) in which they teach. Few have pursued this internship
in the past, but in 2008, 15 science teachers enrolled in ETEC's
Level 4 session. Here, not only their laboratory work but also their
technical writing activities can build upon their level-3 session
background.
To quickly introduce each intern to their mentor's role as a scientist-author,
I gave each one a recent technical article that their individual
mentor had written. We then looked at how to use commercial tools
(such as Web of Knowledge) and similar freeware (such as OCLC's
WorldCat, www.worldcat.org, and Google
Scholar, www.scholar.google.com) to explore that article's intellectual
impact.
Throughout their summer with a researcher "in the wild,"
they received weekly e-mails about classroom-tested technical writing
activities beyond level 3 that they could borrow or adapt for their
own students. Then, late in July, I coached them on the design of
effective science posters (an internship deliverable). Here again,
they applied to a new situation the same good-description guidelines
and usability principles now familiar from their earlier technical
communication work. All of these level-4 enrichments were ETEC firsts
in 2008.
|
CSU Pre-Service Interns
|
Separate from
these working (in-service) teachers were a group of eight pre-service
California State University undergraduates (from various campuses)
at LLNL to prepare for future public-school teaching careers. They
also had a poster requirement and a surprise encounter with technical
writing. Posters, like technical talks, are too often handled as
isolated do-or-die assignments in science classes, with their skill-building
potential wasted.
On July 21, however, the pre-service interns received their own
compressed introduction to the same basic usability issues that
the ETEC Level-3 teachers had explored at greater length. Like their
in-service colleagues, the interns saw poster planning in its larger
context, as yet another problem of effective technical communication,
one that just happens to have very unusual constraints.
|
Two Common Themes
|
Helping these
current and future science teachers to build the technical writing
skills of their students-skills appropriate across the spectrum
of science careers-is always satisfying. This year two unifying
themes emerged during these discussions.
One involved applied science: effective text-design techniques grow
out of decades of empirical (psychological and linguistic) research
applied to the engineering problem of building text that meets reader
needs (an unexpected insight for most science teachers).
The other involved responsibility: science teachers may be the only
people who both recognize that their students need nonnarrative
nonfiction writing skills and have the right technical background
to do something about it.
|
An Invitation
|
To learn more about the
literacy outreach project, to suggest a teacher who might want to
host future technical writing workshops for their classes, or to
participate yourself, please contact T.R.Girill
(trgirill@acm.org).
|
|