
|
 |
The year 2009 marks the tenth anniversary of the EBSTC Technical
Literacy Project. Appropriately enough, two historians of science
(Greg Macklem and Erik Peterson), concerned about "making history
of science integral to the teaching of K-12 science," have
as a side effect provided us with a revealing perspective on the
unfolding of our own literacy project as well ("Beyond Gray
Boxes," History of Science Society Newsletter, April 2009,
online at http://hssonline.org/publications/Newsletter2009/April_education.html).
To effectively influence science students, Macklem and Peterson
argue, history (and, by analogy, technical writing) must do the
following:
- Address the needs of current and future science teachers
- Utilize history of science in a way that supports science teaching
while still being responsible to the history itself
- Provide concrete tools for teachers to take into the classroom
A look at the last decade shows how well our literacy
outreach project has addressed these three needs in terms of
promoting non-fiction writing skills in high school.
|
Address Current and Future Teachers
|
|
To meet the professional development needs of current and future
K-12 teachers, the Project partnered with the Edward Teller Education
Center (ETEC, http://etec.llnl.gov),
which hosts training programs for science teachers every summer
at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Our technical-writing
workshops at ETEC ranged from two hours to two days. Some who attended
these sessions were in-service teachers who were looking for fairly
immediate ways to improve the science literacy of their students.
Others were pre-service teachers who were blending technical writing
into their preparation for credentials and later careers.
Historians of science felt that, to help such classroom teachers
perform differently, they would need "to create [a] new accessible
pedagogical framework" for them. Fortunately, technical writing
has found such a framework in cognitive
apprenticeship, which regards development of nonfiction writing
skills as quite like development of other complex professional skills.
Our workshops shared this approach in person, while the project
website now links every published exercise to cognitive apprenticeship
as its underlying pedagogical context.
|
Support Science Teaching While Promoting Literacy
|
|
Historians Macklem and Peterson note that, in science textbooks,
historical background is too often "separated in gray boxes,
easily ignored by teachers and students alike." To avoid this
fate for technical writing, we have always tried to link literacy
skill building with science (and other) activities that happen in
school classes anyway. We always try point out the role of effective
communication in the lives of successful scientists and engineers.
For example, in classroom visits to middle schools and high schools
(as well as in the corresponding exercises shared on the website),
the literacy project has:
- Applied audience analysis tips to constructing good abstracts
and planning effective technical talks
to classmates (both are common student activities),
- Applied description design techniques to safety problems or
lab notebooks, and
- Applied content organization to crafting useful science-fair
posters.
|
Provide Concrete Classroom Tools
|
|
This third goal has always been at the heart of the project, from
which all our other activities have developed. By adapting these
tools from real life situations, we offer an easy bridge from school
practice to life after graduation (whether at college or in the
trades). All were refined by working with underperforming students
in some of California's most challenged schools.
We share two chief kinds of literacy tools:
- Guidelines — Some of these overt usability checklists
are very general (for designing and revising instructions
and descriptions
in any context). Others are specialized, to help students handle
specific communication challenges, such as planning slides
to support a technical talk.
- Exercises — The project's gradually accumulated set of
skill-building activities
addresses the different needs of technical-writing students and
their teachers. Students receive scaffolding (extra prompts or
cues) to promote skill growth by using authentic examples. Teachers
(in a paired version of each piece) receive time-saving annotations
that summarize relevant empirical research and offer classroom-tested
usage tips.
|
A Thank You and
An Invitation
|
|
This tenth anniversary would not be complete without giving public
thanks to three people who were crucial to this project's success.
- STC member Lenore Weiss
imagined the possibilities and made our first contacts with the
Oakland Unified School District
Associate Editor's Note: Read about Lenore's first efforts in
the Nov./Dec.
1999 newsletter
- Virginia (Jean) Shuler,
a deputy division leader at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
generously supported the project's school-day classroom visits
- Michael Jackson, academic
director of the Media Academy (formerly part of Oakland's Fremont
High School), bravely invited us into his grade-10 classes year
after year.
We hope that our ongoing literacy outreach work will repay our great
debt to them all.
To learn more about the literacy outreach project, to suggest a
teacher who might want to host future technical-writing workshops
for their classes, or to participate yourself, please contact T.R.
Girill (trgirill@acm.org).
|
|